RC#: 19-014
Status: Posted 5Jun18, Recommended by CDC & ESC 19July18
| Name: | Marc Johnson / CDC Chair |
| ADS #: | 9050 |
| Subject: | Identification numbers for ADS/USEF/FEI |
| Rule #: | 944.1 |
| Current Wording: | At ADS-recognized events held in conjunction with USEF/FEI events, an identification number with a different background color or numbering scheme that differentiates the ADS entries from USEF/FEI entries will be required as specified in this article. |
| New Wording: | At ADS-recognized events held in conjunction with USEF/FEI events, an identification number with a different background color or numbering scheme that differentiates the ADS entries from USEF/FEI entries will be [Delete: |
| Reason for Change: | The requirement has not been followed. |
| Type of change: | Clarify |
Tracey Morgan says :
June 10, 2018Supported by the Driven Dressage Committee
Jheroen Dorenbosch says :
June 29, 2018944.1 deals with Event Numbers, not with identification numbers. So maybe: At ADS-recognized events held in conjunction with USEF/FEI events, an Event Number with a different background color or numbering scheme that differentiates the ADS entries from USEF/FEI entries will be [Delete: required] suggested as specified in this article.
Or, better, maybe replace Event Number with Identification Number everywhere (since that is the title of article 944).
ashemont says :
August 29, 2018Cannot support this. To change a rule just because a requirement is not being followed is setting a bad precedent. And I do think ADS entries should be differentiated from USEF/FEI entries. If an Organizer chooses to do both then it should be with the knowledge that entries will have to be differentiated.
Linda Yutzy says :
August 31, 2018I agree that because a rule isn’t followed shouldn’t mean it should be removed. Seriously?